Search for: "Sharpe v. Department of Justice" Results 1 - 20 of 370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2009, 11:07 pm
Washington D.C. is "the window through which the world looks into our house," wrote the Justice Department in the Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae in Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:05 am by Daniel Hemel
As he wrote in his dissent in Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
  Sharp LJ rejected this argument, because the approach to open justice was well settled and most members of the public understand the presumption of innocence. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 5:10 pm by Katie Bart
’” Treanor prodded Kagan on her sharp dissent in Knick v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:41 am by CLARE MONTGOMERY QC
Hargreaves v Powys County Council Trading Standards Department [2015] EWHC 1803 (Admin) confirms that neither the powers of the criminal courts under section 78 of PACE nor the powers of the court under section 59 are a suitable alternative remedy. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed Mr Khuja’s appeal, with Sharp LJ giving the only judgment. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:35 am
Justice Department drew upon letter from Secretary of State Dean Acheson in its brief in Brown v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:31 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Hallam & Anor, R (on the applications of) v The Secretary of State for Justice (rev 1) [2016] EWCA Civ 355 (11 April 2016) High Court (Administrative Court) B, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWHC 786 (Admin) (12 April 2016) Sino, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWHC 803 (Admin) (12 April 2016) Harris & Anor, R… [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm by Ronald Mann
Sharp divisions marked previous cases in the area, several of which were decided without any single majority opinion. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:48 am by Matthew Forys
This ruling is not a surprise after Justice Samuel Alito’s sharp criticism of Abood in Knox v. [read post]