Search for: "Sharpe v. Department of Justice"
Results 41 - 60
of 512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2020, 3:49 am
” At the ABA Journal, Erwin Chemerinsky writes that upcoming abortion case June Medical Services v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 4:09 am
Any application to depart from it must therefore be carefully scrutinised” [21] The rule derived strength from the “open justice principle” [23]. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:06 am
In Part V of the census opinion, the chief justice found a way to provide a unique check here. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am
The first is Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
The Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed Mr Khuja’s appeal, with Sharp LJ giving the only judgment. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:30 pm
” Zoe Tillman of BuzzFeed News reports that “The Justice Department And Trump’s Lawyers Argue No One Should Be Able To Sue Him For Profiting From His Hotel. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:15 am
" The Justice Department announced it will seek a Supreme Court review. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:43 am
Daimler in Mannheim, Sharp v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am
A 1978 Supreme Court case, Monell v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:00 pm
Co., L.P.A. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 5:34 am
Executive Health Resources, Inc., concerns the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) ability to dismiss qui tam whistleblower cases in which it did not initially intervene. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:12 pm
Department of Justice (DOJ) the authority to dismiss qui tam whistleblower lawsuits in cases in which it chose not to intervene. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:20 pm
In today's Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin has this article on Solicitor General Paul Clement - "one of the conservative legal movement's brightest stars" - who is now charged with overseeing the Justice Department's investigation into the controversy over the firing of U.S. attorneys; Peter Lattman weighs in here at the WSJ.com Law Blog. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:02 am
Early on, the Department of Justice issued a memorandum supporting the appointments stating that a president can make recess appointments when lawmakers hold pro forma sessions without conducting business. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm
Justice Sonia Sotomayor is up next with the opinion in North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Loving v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:58 am
” The Court’s reasoning drew sharp criticism from Justice Sonia Sotomayor (above left). [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm
The case of Lachaux v Independent Print, most important libel appeal of 2016 will be heard by the Court of Appeal (McFarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) on 29 and 30 November 2016. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:32 pm
” The order’s sharp comment about the Justice Department’s “disruption” of lawyer-client access was a response to the Department’s argument, in court papers and to detainees’ lawyers, that Judge Urbina’s dismissal of the 14 cases meant that the protective orders were no longer in effect. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:21 am
The Eleventh Circuit’s decision upheld the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) dismissal of a qui tam whistleblower suit. [read post]
