Search for: "Sharpe v. Department of Justice" Results 41 - 60 of 356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2012, 9:02 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
Early on, the Department of Justice issued a memorandum supporting the appointments stating that a president can make recess appointments when lawmakers hold pro forma sessions without conducting business.     [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Sonia Sotomayor is up next with the opinion in North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:58 am by Diane Marie Amann
” The Court’s reasoning drew sharp criticism from Justice Sonia Sotomayor (above left). [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The case of Lachaux v Independent Print, most important libel appeal of 2016 will be heard by the Court of Appeal (McFarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) on 29 and 30 November 2016. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 7:56 pm
The Justice Department is keenly interested in having the DTA process put on hold. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:32 pm
” The order’s sharp comment about the Justice Department’s “disruption” of lawyer-client access was a response to the Department’s argument, in court papers and to detainees’ lawyers, that Judge Urbina’s dismissal of the 14 cases meant that the protective orders were no longer in effect. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:30 am by Matt Sundquist
The Department of Justice filed a brief Friday urging the Court to dismiss Kiyemba v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm by Blake Marcus
Rodriguez v United States (6-3 decision written by Justice Ginsberg) Facts: Officer Struble observed a Mercury Mountaineer veer slowly onto the shoulder of a Nebraska highway for about 1 to 2 seconds and then jerk back onto the road. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  Also, Baroness Hale’s analysis sits in sharp contrast to the approach that Mr Justice Eady would later take in Mosley where he was less convinced that the commission of any crime is always a matter of public interest meriting publication (Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB), [117]). [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
The applicable law Justice Department policy for subpoenas of the press is set out in department regulations, codified at 28 C.F.R. [read post]