Search for: "Sharpe v. Department of Justice" Results 61 - 80 of 360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  Also, Baroness Hale’s analysis sits in sharp contrast to the approach that Mr Justice Eady would later take in Mosley where he was less convinced that the commission of any crime is always a matter of public interest meriting publication (Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB), [117]). [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
The applicable law Justice Department policy for subpoenas of the press is set out in department regulations, codified at 28 C.F.R. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Dame Victoria Sharp, sitting at the Old Bailey with Mr Justice Warby, found Mr Yaxley-Lennon in contempt, by livestreaming the video from outside the public entrance to the court and by “aggressively confronting and filming” some of the defendants. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 3:56 am by Dean Freeman
A study by the National Institute of Justice found that most departments had written policies governing pursuits. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 2:04 am by Peter Mahler
A recent decision by a Manhattan trial judge in Holdrum Investments, N.V. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:22 am by Joy Waltemath
Before his appointment to the Tenth Circuit in 2006, Gorsuch was a practicing attorney and then served in the Department of Justice as the Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General in 2005, according to the White House. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:26 am by CJLF Staff
Lawyers are now petitioning new cases to the Supreme Court involving other prisoners who were 14 when they were committed their murders, urging the justices to extend last year's decision Graham v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 21 November the Court of Appeal delivered a major decision on the statutory public interest defence for defamation claims, in the case of Alexander Economou v David de Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Independent News & Media has said that Ireland’s libel laws threaten public interest reporting in a submission to a statutory review being conducted by the Department of Justice. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with “actual malice”Shulman v Hunderfund, 12 NY3d 143In the words of Justice Smith, “In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254 [1964]). [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On the same day the Court of Appeal (Longmore, Sharp and Bean LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of Tinkler v Ferguson [2019] EWCA Civ 819. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
The justices held 5-4 in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 2:13 pm by William S. Dodge
Department of State, where he worked on the amicus briefs filed by the United States in Kiobel v. [read post]