Search for: "Sharpe v. Department of Justice"
Results 81 - 100
of 512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm
The applicable law Justice Department policy for subpoenas of the press is set out in department regulations, codified at 28 C.F.R. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:08 pm
On 21 November the Court of Appeal delivered a major decision on the statutory public interest defence for defamation claims, in the case of Alexander Economou v David de Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 11:35 pm
In Sisvel v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 2:04 am
A recent decision by a Manhattan trial judge in Holdrum Investments, N.V. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
Independent News & Media has said that Ireland’s libel laws threaten public interest reporting in a submission to a statutory review being conducted by the Department of Justice. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with “actual malice”Shulman v Hunderfund, 12 NY3d 143In the words of Justice Smith, “In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254 [1964]). [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
On the same day the Court of Appeal (Longmore, Sharp and Bean LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of Tinkler v Ferguson [2019] EWCA Civ 819. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
Sharpe, 347 U. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
In Miree v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
The Justice Department subsequently opened a criminal investigation in March 2022, and a federal grand jury investigation began in A [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
The justices held 5-4 in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm
The US government has appealed a UK judge’s ruling against the extradition of the WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange, according to a justice department official. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
However, when the Supreme Court was presented with an opportunity to depart from Collins, it did not take it. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:36 pm
The Court’s docket indicates that the Justices will consider whether to grant the petitions in Moores v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
The Justice Department had been scrutinizing the deal since early this year. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 1:07 pm
The cases are Boumediene v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:52 am
[Anand Agneshwar and Paige Sharpe, WLF, and on Mallory v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:04 am
Department of State. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
The Justice Department entered the case in Texas courts to defend energetically the President's action. [read post]
