Search for: "Sharpe v. Department of Justice"
Results 101 - 120
of 512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2020, 5:06 pm
Purdue entered into a settlement with the Department of Justice for its civil liability (False Claims Act stuff, etc.): The settlement fixed the amount of the DOJ's previously disputed claim. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:26 am
Further, Ouseley J held that their quashing would depend on the facts as to unfairness and their setting aside would depend on the interests of justice. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
The Justice Department had been scrutinizing the deal since early this year. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:42 am
The Supreme Court granted the Department of Justice’s requests to vacate those injunctions, with 5-4 votes noted in two of the decisions. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Once this system takes hold, it forms a true equilibrium from which only oddball states (Maine and Nebraska) will depart. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 1:47 am
Epic Games v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:43 am
Daimler in Mannheim, Sharp v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 11:35 pm
In Sisvel v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:17 am
Department of Justice. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
They may also wish to consider the impact of the differing institutions in which lawyers work and address business and human rights issues, such as outside law firms, in house counsel departments, governments, and civil society, among others. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 4:24 pm
In Voss v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am
The Justice Department pondered a Nixon indictment after his resignation. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
Scalia’s opinion in D.C. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 1:31 pm
"] From a Kansas Supreme Court majority opinion (by Justice Stegall) earlier this month in State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:23 pm
Oklahoma and Sharp v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
Contemporary observers noted the sharp contrast in the appearance and delivery of the speakers. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
Montana Department of Revenue (a 5-4 decision on the First Amendment’s religion clauses) revealed, sometimes unanimity or near unanimity must take a back seat to how the law is shaped. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
Here, no valid penological purpose existed as to the alleged acts of the Sheriff’s Department. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
[Justice Gorsuch does not agree with, or even cite, Reed v. [read post]
