Search for: "Shaughnessy v. Mezei"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am
In reaching this conclusion, the Ninth Circuit primarily applied the framework in Boumediene v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
To reach its decision, the Ninth Circuit applied the framework in Boumediene v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 10:37 am
” The government also cites Shaughnessy v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
Shaughnessy (1950). [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
It is remarkable that a basic recitation of Washington v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 7:00 pm
” It was on this basis that the Court held in the 1953 case Shaughnessy v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:48 am
In Shaughnessy v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 5:52 pm
In 1953, in Shaughnessy v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:33 am
They resonate with some of the most shameful constitutional moments in our history, from the poor treatment of longtime U.S. residents accused of Communist Party affiliations validated by the Supreme Court in Shaughnessy v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
In 1953, at the height of the Cold War, the court in Shaughnessy v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 7:15 am
” In support of this proposition, the government cites a case from 1953, Shaughnessy v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 7:45 pm
Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 719 (2001) (Kennedy, J., dissenting) (citing Shaughnessy v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm
Shaughnessy (1950); in which the Court held that the non-citizen wife of a U.S. citizen could be denied admission based on secret evidence, and Shaughnessy v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:38 am
Guest Blogger: Erich Snow, second-year law student, University of San Francisco: At the beginning of any substantive law course law students are typically shown a traditional case where the law and common sense diverge, and the students are allowed to... [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:12 am
Shaughnessy and Shaughnessy v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am
See, e.g., Landon v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 7:54 pm
Bush (08-5424) focused on the meaning of a 1953 decision, Shaughnessy v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:02 pm
The motion contended that Judge Urbina’s finding that it is illegal to keep the 17 prisoners at Guantanamo flatly contradicts a 1953 Supreme Court ruling, Shaughnessy v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:29 pm
But Urbina said the principal case on which the government relied, Shaughnessy v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 9:39 am
The judges of England developed the writ of habeas corpus largely to preserve these immunities from executive restraint.” Shaughnessy v. [read post]
