Search for: "Shaw v. Reno"
Results 21 - 39
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Shaw v. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100+ Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know
7 Nov 2022, 7:24 am
Yoder (1972), and Shaw v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 11:12 am
The Shaw v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Reno violation was based on clearly erroneous fact-finding; and (4) whether the majority erred in holding that strict scrutiny requires a legislature to adopt the least restrictive means possible for complying with the Voting Rights Act, instead of a redistricting plan that substantially addresses such compliance. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 1:46 pm
Of course, the Shaw v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:05 am
In the 1990s, the 5-4 Supreme Court held in a line of cases starting with Shaw v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
It calls into mind Daniel Lowenstein’s critique of the predominant factor test from Shaw v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:08 am
Harris, both in 2017) have considered the extent to which a fear of Section 2 liability can justify drawing district lines primarily on the basis of race, when a separate line of Supreme Court jurisprudence (beginning with Shaw v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:41 pm
Reno (1993) and Grutter v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm
Although Section 2 requires jurisdictions with large minority populations to take race into account in drawing district lines, in a series of cases beginning with the 1993 case of Shaw v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Reno). [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:43 pm
The general rule that the Supreme Court established in 1993 in yet another North Carolina case, Shaw v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
Paparelli is a partner at Seyfarth Shaw in New York and Los Angeles. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
They argued, among other things, that (1) the three-judge panel ran afoul of Shaw v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm
Reno. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 5:04 am
Redickand most of all Coach K”; (d) “she performed superbly in a 1L Ames [moot court] competition against two current members of the Elect, Michael Gottlieb and [Dorothy] Hien Tran (who were also outstanding, and who are now Danielle’s good friends)”; (e) Danielle “came up with an incisive interpretation of Shaw v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
Citing Shaw v Reno (509 U.S. 630, 1993), he asserted that, in cautioning against impermissible racial stereotypes, the Supreme Court has rejected the assumption that all individuals of the same race think alike, but that proposition would be a necessary beginning point were the Seattle formulation to control. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
Finally, Rapelje v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Romano, Seyfarth, Shaw, Washington, D.C., for amici National Association of Recording Merchandisers, Inc. and Video Software Dealers Association. [read post]
