Search for: "Shaw v. Reno"
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm
But almost immediately after the start of that regime, beginning with the Shaw v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm
Vera and Shaw v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm
Reno. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
They argued, among other things, that (1) the three-judge panel ran afoul of Shaw v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
Finally, Rapelje v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
It calls into mind Daniel Lowenstein’s critique of the predominant factor test from Shaw v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Reno violation was based on clearly erroneous fact-finding; and (4) whether the majority erred in holding that strict scrutiny requires a legislature to adopt the least restrictive means possible for complying with the Voting Rights Act, instead of a redistricting plan that substantially addresses such compliance. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 7:10 pm
The petition of the day is: Cantor v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm
Although Section 2 requires jurisdictions with large minority populations to take race into account in drawing district lines, in a series of cases beginning with the 1993 case of Shaw v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
Reno, tomorrow at 6 p.m. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Reno, by Daniel P. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
Paparelli is a partner at Seyfarth Shaw in New York and Los Angeles. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 12:29 pm
Shaw v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:51 am
In Bush v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:41 pm
Reno (1993) and Grutter v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:13 am
SYMPOSIUM: VOTING RIGHTS AFTER SHAW v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 8:48 am
Reno, recognizing the "unconstitutional racial gerrymander," Bush v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:05 am
In the 1990s, the 5-4 Supreme Court held in a line of cases starting with Shaw v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 5:04 am
Redickand most of all Coach K”; (d) “she performed superbly in a 1L Ames [moot court] competition against two current members of the Elect, Michael Gottlieb and [Dorothy] Hien Tran (who were also outstanding, and who are now Danielle’s good friends)”; (e) Danielle “came up with an incisive interpretation of Shaw v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 1:46 pm
Of course, the Shaw v. [read post]
