Search for: "Shaw v. Shaw"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,643
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2021, 6:33 pm
” Shaw v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:13 am
Defendant’s failure to lodge a timely, specific objection to the billing was insufficient to rebut any inference of an agreement to pay the stated amount (see Shaw v Silver, 95 AD3d 416 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 3:03 pm
JULIE SHAW, Appellant, v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
Alt-Right, Greenblatt v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:07 am
Corp. v Shaw, 72 AD3d 258, 263, 265; see also Mahler v Campagna, 60 AD3d 1009, 1012). [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 7:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 5:52 am
Norwitz, Sabastian V. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 9:31 am
United States, and criminal prosecutions for trade secret misappropriation and discussion of lessons learned Best practices for updating and structuring agreements and policies to adequately protect company assets and trade secrets, including addressing the challenge for multi-state employers of an increasing divergence of state laws SpeakersMichael Wexler, Partner, Seyfarth Shaw LLPRobert Milligan, Partner, Seyfarth Shaw LLPJoshua Salinas, Associate, Seyfarth Shaw LLP… [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
Sock It To Me, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:51 am
” In 2018, the California Supreme Court ruled in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:33 am
A recent California Supreme Court decision, Ward v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am
‘Religious Equality’ Is Transforming American Law By Zalman Rothschild, Adjunct Professor of Law, New York University School of Law Zalman Rothschild looks at the upcoming Supreme Court case, Fulton v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 5:39 pm
Shaw v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 6:03 am
Mirvis, William Savitt, and Sabastian V. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:17 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 12:09 pm
Katfriend John Shaw looked at the legal issues recently arisen around Netflix's Enola Holmes. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:11 am
June 2014 Judge Posner at p. 8 referring to Silverman v CBS 870 F.2d 40, 49 -51 (2d Cir. 1989). [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:08 am
Harris, both in 2017) have considered the extent to which a fear of Section 2 liability can justify drawing district lines primarily on the basis of race, when a separate line of Supreme Court jurisprudence (beginning with Shaw v. [read post]
