Search for: "Shaw v. Shaw"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,636
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
., on Friday, July 5, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Controlling shareholders, Dual-class stock, ESG, Institutional Investors, Lyft, Shareholder voting, Uber Director Independence and Oversight Obligation in Marchand v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:50 am
Following the Illinois Supreme Court’s decision in Rosenbach v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:53 am
Briefly: At Public Discourse, Derek Muller explains that “[t]he heart of the conflict between majority’s opinion and the dissenting opinion” in Rucho v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:45 am
Amy Howe reports for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court, that after announcing in the wake of the court’s decision in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:32 am
Buy-sell agreements, like a shotgun sale triggered by a deadlock, are the principal means by which the owners of closely held businesses protect against the worst consequences of deadlock. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:29 pm
As we blogged HERE, this question was answered in the negative by the Illinois Supreme Court in Rosenbach v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:01 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
In Shaw v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Winter argues that Melville intended to identify Vere with Shaw. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:52 am
” Kate Shaw interviews retired Justice John Paul Stevens about the justice’s new memoir for this blog. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
Kate Shaw is a law professor at Cardozo Law School. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:48 am
Shaw v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Not only does this strategy undermine our commitment to a right of access to the courts, and ignore the Supreme Court of Canada’s clear statement in Pintea v John that SRLs cannot and should not be treated the same way as expert counsel, but by punishing SRLs for their unintended mistakes with vexatious litigant and court restriction orders, this strategy is also making the public angrier and even more indignant at their treatment in Canada’s Access to Justice crisis. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
John Shaw looks at how LEGO has recently implemented long term brand protection strategy in the UK. [read post]
15 May 2019, 11:04 am
City of Los Angeles, California 18-1257 Issues: (1) What test – in a case under Shaw v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 12:06 pm
In this divorce action, Strauss v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:59 am
See, e.g., Shaw v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 9:30 pm
Connecticut, Roe v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:12 am
., on Saturday, April 13, 2019 Tags: Appraisal rights, Boards of Directors, Delaware law, DGCL, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Safe harbor, State law Lorenzo v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:05 am
Medley Capital In FrontFour Capital Group, LLC et al v. [read post]
