Search for: "Shaw v. Shaw"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,643
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2024, 3:32 pm
*Strict ScrutinyStrict Scrutiny is part of the Crooked Media podcast family and is hosted by three constitutional law professors, Leah Litman (U. of Michigan Law School), Kate Shaw (Yeshiva University Benjamin N. [read post]
Precedential No. 2: TTAB Affirms Refusal to Register Proposed Multi-Color Mark for Breakfast Cereals
9 Jan 2024, 4:16 am
Shaw). [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:27 am
Nippon Shinyaku Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ATTORNEY’S FEES ■Jose Parra, Applicant v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight our top regulatory essays of 2023 authored by a select number of our many expert contributors. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:08 am
” (Shaw v Silver, 95 AD3d 416, 416 [1st Dept 2012].) [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:06 am
Muldrow v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
Carly Forrest et al, Lexology: Vicarious Liability in Scotland – the retreat continues: on the recent Inner House judgment in C & S v Shaw and Live Active Leisure [2023] CSIH 36. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
From the Fifth Circuit's decision Thursday in Torrey v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:52 am
This comes amidst a backdrop where AI models currently cannot be recognized as inventors, a stance reaffirmed in the Federal Circuit decision Thaler v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Shaw.[10] That is the highest penalty on record for a standalone violation of the rule. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:14 pm
Particularly when the lawsuit involves, as here, a relatively well-known firm, I'm particularly interested in both the underlying facts as well as the result.Here, Seyfarth Shaw prevails, both in the trial court (in which the plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their lawsuit after receiving the trial court's tentative) as well as in the Court of Appeal (where they get their anti-SLAPP fees increased from the 80% that the trial court granted to the full 100%). [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 8:56 am
By: Rachel V. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
” See Buckley v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
IPSO 19756-23 Saunders v mirror.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19679-23 Saunders v walesonline.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement 18579-23 Reynolds v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediated 18539-23 Garnier v Tenbury Wells Advertiser, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigatio 17700-23… [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:40 am
From Parlatore v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 3:49 am
Shaw). [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 4:03 am
Shaw). [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 10:52 am
By: Rachel V. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 10:21 am
By: Rachel V. [read post]
