Search for: "Shea v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2014, 1:41 pm by Wells Bennett
Twitter brings news of this interesting little order in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:18 am
This odyssey of a criminal prosecution began back on July 8, 2009, when the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York issued a press release announcing SIX CHARGED IN $140 MILLION INVESTMENT FRAUD AND STOCK MANIPULATION SCHEME. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 5:49 pm by Charnovitz
United States) cites numerous prior customs court and appellate decisions. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:15 pm by pfriedman
It’s well worth revisiting the decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit (the Circuit in which the court hearing Shepard Fairey’s lawsuit against AP and Manny Garcia is pending) in Blanch v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
That rejection was correct under Montana election law, the majority held: There is one Section within [Montana election law]—the Montana Absent Uniformed Services and Overseas Voter Act—that expressly authorizes the use of "digital signatures" for active-duty United States military members and United States citizens residing outside the United States but eligible to vote. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 12:38 am by CMS
Background The appellant – KBR, Inc – was a company incorporated in the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” Account Stated Claim An “account stated” is “an agreement between the parties to an account based upon prior transactions between them with respect to the correctness of the separate items composing the account and the balance due, if any, in favor of one party or the other” (Shea & Gould v Burr, 194 AD2d 369, 370 [1st Dept 1993] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
The majority expressed some doubt about whether that tire chalking is actually a search under the physical trespass theory of United States v. [read post]