Search for: "Sheff v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 68
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Introduction: Jeanne Fromer Private actors pursue their own interests. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 7:50 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Jeremy Sheff: registrants who were entities created by tribes v. tribal members? [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Jeremy Sheff: Spread of knowledge—evangelical perspectives may differ from nonevangelical. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
McKenna: we can’t really mean that a state of uncertainty is actionable—if we did, “I don’t know whether X makes this” would be actionable/part of the “confused” group. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Whether Sheff is the same person today that he was 20 years ago is not a useful question for how we should think about our actions and our future selves. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Way to deal with specimen laundering, as in LTTB and in Ohio State’s THE. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Norton Rose Fulbright Data Protection Report had a post “New York State imposes a $1.5 million penalty in cybersecurity breach case”. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Sheff says: maybe both infringement and dilution are proxies for when we think sellers are manipulating consumers’ bounded rationality. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Surveys, testimony, observing online behavior are all different sources of empirical evidence: searches originating on Amazon v. searches originating on Google. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States The New York Law Journal reports that a libel claim filed [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 2:33 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Ouellette (@PatentScholar) April 5, 2019David Olson (@PIEBCLaw): How can patentees use licenses to price discriminate under current exhaustion law post-Impression v. [read post]