Search for: "Shelby v. Guy"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2013, 5:49 pm
As we all wait to hear what the Supreme Court decides to do with Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:34 am
While perhaps not as “unique” as the Westboro Baptist brief in Windsordescribed by Jason below, the brief Constitutional Accountability Center filed on behalf of scholars including Jack Balkin in Shelby County v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
FBL) in UT SW v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 3:04 pm
The Supreme Court is hearing two election law cases this Term -- one extremely important case (Shelby County) involving Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, the other (Arizona v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:47 am
Circuit panel in Shelby County v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:27 pm
-William Brennan: He receives an extra push from me because I'm a voting rights guy, and he pretty much started the field with Baker v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:30 pm
In 2009, in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 12:21 pm
After Shelby County v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
It seems to me that the important distinction is that what is in the constitutional canon will be hard to change, and the Roberts Court majority has shown in Shelby County v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
It seems to me that the important distinction is that what is in the constitutional canon will be hard to change, and the Roberts Court majority has shown in Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am
This blog’s Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:51 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am
You will recall that a few years back in Shelby County v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 4:20 am
” Before Shelby County v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 12:49 pm
Professor Rick Hasen has some thoughts on RNC v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:09 am
Chism v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
City of Shelby, 13-1318, gets its fourth relist. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 12:30 pm
In 1957, in Lambert v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
The guy's decision has preclusive effect. [read post]