Search for: "Shell Oil Co. v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2022, 2:10 pm
Well, it's probably not true.Coca Cola, Pepsi Co (which owns Pizza Hut), Shell Oil, BP Oil, and Starbucks (ouch- no morning cup of coffee- talk about sanctions taking a bite) are also shutting down Russian operations. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:10 am
See Kiobel, et al. v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
One of the four widows, Esther Kiobel had brought a suit against Shell in the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
Shell Oil Products Co. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:26 am
Citing Rebel Oil Co. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 9:52 am
Shell Oil Products Co. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:53 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:48 pm
Shell Oil Co., 2008 WL 7856015, at *4 (C.D. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
<> The Hopi Tribe v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:58 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 1:37 pm
By Natalie Barletta: In Shell Oil Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm
” The Oil Companies contracted to have McColl, a former Shell engineer, dump the waste at property in Fullerton, California. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
In Shell Oil Co. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
In Shell Oil Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir. 2010), held that if a defendant properly removed a putative class action at the get-go, a district court’s subsequent denial of class certification does not divest the court of jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:32 pm
They reiterate that for a case to be given jurisdiction by ATS it must a) touch and concern the United States with sufficient force to displace the presumption against extraterritoriality and: b) demonstrate that the conduct, prima facie, breaches a law of nations or treaty of the United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087, 1091-92 (9th Cir. 2010), which addressing a similar issue upon a case removed to the federal court under CAFA, held that post-filing developments do not defeat jurisdiction if jurisdiction was properly invoked as of the time of filing. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087, 1091-92 (9th Cir. 2010), which addressing a similar issue upon a case removed to the federal court under CAFA, held that post-filing developments do not defeat jurisdiction if jurisdiction was properly invoked as of the time of filing. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:45 am
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
Louis Martinez, III, No. 10-0426 Shell Oil Company, et al. v. [read post]
