Search for: "Shepard v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2016, 4:04 am by Andres
The brief concludes with the assertion that no court in the United States has been asked to determine whether a language is subject to copyright protection, and they call on the judge to “declare that there is no basis in either law or policy to allow copyright in a spoken language. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:41 pm by Evan Lee
On Tuesday, April 26, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Mathis v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 1:35 pm
Overwhelmingly, states across the United States have stated that it is not subject to tax. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 1:35 pm
Overwhelmingly, states across the United States have stated that it is not subject to tax. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am by Schachtman
Olah, “My Search for Carbocations and Their Role in Chemistry,” Nobel Lecture (Dec. 8, 1994), quoting George von Békésy, Experiments in Hearing 8 (N.Y. 1960); see also McMillan v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:48 am
  Living in the State of California, I needed to find California Authority to help this lady.So, I use a technique called Shepardizing. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:29 pm by Jon Sands
United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990), and Shepard v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm by Donald Thompson
 The Court, explicitly recognizing the relationship between suggestiveness and mistakes in identification has repeatedly expressed concern that police arranged identification procedures may alter a witness’s memory rendering the subsequent identification testimony unreliable (United States v Wade, 388 US 218 [1967], Stovall v Denno, 388 US 293 [1967]; Simmons v United States, 390 US 377 [1968]; Manson v Braithwaite,… [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
  Generally, government employees are immune from discovery in private litigation under rules first set out in United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 10:24 am by Shawn Nevers
Say we’re looking at Judge Learned Hand’s opinion in United States v. [read post]