Search for: "Shepherd v. May" Results 221 - 240 of 363
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm by Giles Peaker
YA v London Borough of Hammersmith And Fulham [2016] EWHC 1850 (Admin) YA was in care with H&F for a number of years and was now a care leaver. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:37 am by South Florida Lawyers
"I think I'm glad I'm a litigator instead of a real estate lawyer.Park Adult v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:13 pm
Broker Omissions Could Doom Morgan Keegan, Courthouse News Service, May 7, 2012 Fraud lawsuit vs Morgan Keegan revived, Chicago Tribune, May 2, 2012 SEC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 9:31 am by Giles Peaker
That delay was unlawful. v) Was the s.188(1) duty subsequently re-activated by the claimant requesting temporary accommodation? [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 11:19 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Nov. 26, 2013) Related Posts: Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 12:32 am
Mr Enchev entered into a contract with Voltino in May 2017 (though the contents of the contract were not disclosed to the court) and was found to be the controlling mind of Big Horn UK Limited, also in charge of Big Horn UK’s social media accounts.After a rejection of Red Bull’s opposition to the Big Horn mark on 23 May 2018, Red Bull’s appeal was upheld and Voltino’s trade mark application was rejected in its entirety on 7 January 2019. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 2:39 pm
”  As such, any argument that the manufacture should have included such a warning was preempted by Pliva v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 1:38 pm
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:30 am by Michael Scutt
 It has always been the case that an employee can prepare to compete, but the recent case of Shepherds Investments Ltd v Walters [2006] EWHC 836 suggests that might not be quite so straightforward now. [read post]