Search for: "Shepherd v. May" Results 141 - 160 of 369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2011, 8:29 am by Jim W Hildreth
Advantages to Mediation v Arbitration or Litigation From First TuesdayMediation: a viable alternativeRather than immediately resorting to the costly and adversarial process of arbitration or litigation, in recent years the trend in real estate sales transactions indicates disputants favor the use of mediation. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 11:07 pm
Through a case-study of two recent defamation cases, the high-profile litigation of Ettingshausen v Australian Consolidated Press and the comparatively little known case of Shepherd v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Lord Glennie did not consider that anything which had been pleaded in the present case created any sort of special circumstance where the director would be found personally liable for the company.He also considered the argument that Mr Emerson was jointly liable with Alba as tortfeasor because he either procured or assisted it in its wrongdoing (CBS Songs Ltd v Amstrad Consumer Electronics plc [1988] UKHL 15,Fish & Fish Ltd v Sea Shepherd UK [2015] UKSC10). [read post]
26 May 2012, 7:05 pm
Financial Regulators,, May 17, 2012 Courts Must Reject Settlement Pacts Where Necessary, Former, Current Judges Say, Bloomberg BNA, May 15, 2012 SEC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:45 pm by Milena Sterio
  However, as I have blogged before, the 9th Circuit recently found in Cetacean v. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 8:17 am
As I discussed here, the Delaware Supreme Court recently decided Wood v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
Related Web Resources: Fund Suits May Be Allowed by Supreme Court,, November 26, 2007 James LaRue v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 6:10 am
" The entry ends with this quote from an editorial in the Fort Wayne Journal Gazette:The disagreement is the latest that shows how important it is for legislators and their legal advisers to scrutinize the precise language of the bills they author and shepherd through the legislative process.The entry concluded with this observation from the ILB:This brings to mind a recent Supreme Court ruling (see ILB entry here from June 23rd), Utility Center, Inc., d/b/a Aquasource v. [read post]