Search for: "Sherbert v. Verner" Results 61 - 80 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Eugene Volokh] Many liberals’ (sensible) retreat from the old Justice Brennan/ACLU position on religious exemptions
1 Apr 2015, 9:56 am
In Sherbert v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] A brief political history of religious exemptions
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
Justice William Brennan, author of Sherbert v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
The Supreme Court Decides Holt v. Hobbs the Way It Decided Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: With a License to Dictate Public Policy from the Bench
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
S. 205 (1972), and Sherbert v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
The Supreme Court Decides Holt v. Hobbs the Way It Decided Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: With a License to Dictate Public Policy from the Bench
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
S. 205 (1972), and Sherbert v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Beards, Prisons, Religion, and Federalism
20 Jan 2015, 2:26 pm by Kent Scheidegger
S. 205 (1972), and Sherbert v. [read post]
Crime and Consequences - http://www.crimeandconsequences.com/crimblog/
[Eugene Volokh] Holt v. Hobbs: Unanimous victory for Muslim prisoner in religious rights case
20 Jan 2015, 7:44 am
’ Thomas v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Profesionales del derecho y ciencias sociales discuten interacción de la religión con el estado
24 Nov 2014, 12:09 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
La ley restableció el test del caso Sherbert v. [read post]
Microjuris al Día - http://aldia.microjuris.com/
How to Fix the Religious Freedom Restoration Act
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The leading example of a successful exceptions claim in the pre-Smith period was Sherbert v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
[Will Baude] Is RFRA limited to pre-Smith jurisprudence, or does RFRA run through it?
9 Jul 2014, 5:55 am
Verner and Wisconsin v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Religion, Health, Corporations, and the Court
8 Jul 2014, 1:30 pm by Stephen Gottlieb
Verner. [read post]
Constitutionalism & Democracy - http://constitutionalismanddemocracy.wordpress.com/
Hobby Lobby Part XVIII -- The one (potentially) momentous aspect of Hobby Lobby: Untethering RFRA from free exercise doctrine
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm by Marty Lederman
" That is why a unanimous Supreme Court was able to declare, in the 1982 case of U.S. v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Are Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan generally condemning RFRA-like regimes (maybe even state ones)?
30 Jun 2014, 1:25 pm
Justice Stevens, after all, didn’t limit his objection to the Sherbert/Yoder test to commercial cases such as United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Hobby Lobby Part XVI -- A half-dozen possibilities that shouldn't surprise you in today's decision
30 Jun 2014, 4:50 am by Marty Lederman
Verner and Wisconsin v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
The Narrow (and Proper) Way for the Court to Rule in Hobby Lobby’s Favor
10 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Alan E. Brownstein
The Sebelius v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Religious exemptions — a guide for the confused
24 Mar 2014, 4:32 am
But in Sherbert v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
The Insatiable Demand for Extreme Religious Liberty Under the RFRAs, Part I: Why Hobby Lobby Falls Outside RFRA’s Protections
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Verner and Yoder v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Symposium: Religious questions and saving constructions
18 Feb 2014, 8:12 am by Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle
Verner and Wisconsin v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Hobby Lobby Part III-A—Does federal law substantially pressure employers to offer health insurance coverage in violation of religious obligations, even though there is no “Employer Mandate”?
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am by Marty Lederman
The plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood argue that federal law compels them to act contrary to their religious obligations, by requiring them to offer (and pay for and administer) employee health insurance plans that include contraception coverage. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Hobby Lobby Part III—There is no “Employer Mandate”
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Hobby Lobby Part I -- Framing the issues
11 Dec 2013, 7:28 pm by Marty Lederman
Verner (1963) and Employment Div. v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/