Search for: "Sherlock v. Alling"
Results 1 - 20
of 139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2013, 1:00 am
Those elements, Mr Klinger claimed, are in the public domain because the Sherlock Holmes books and stories published prior to 1923 (which includes all Sherlock works other than ten stories published in The Case-Book of Sherlock Holmes) are no longer subject to copyright protection under US copyright law. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:02 pm
” Photo Credit: Library of Congress In the meantime, all but the last ten Sherlock Holmes stories are free of copyright, allowing all you Holmes fans and creative writers the option of writing your own stories based on the Sherlock Holmes characters without getting permission or paying a fee to the Conan Doyle estate. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:58 am
, v USA Cable, 2004 U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 2:20 pm
The Conan Doyle Estate also dispatches with what would seem to be contradictory case law, Silverman v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:21 pm
Holmes could be more usable to all of us as a result, after the US Court of Appeals published its decision almost a month ago.For the uninitiated, the case of Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate dealt with Leslie Klinger, who intended to publish a book called In the Company of Sherlock Holmes; a sequel to his book A Study in Sherlock Holmes, a book very much written under the blessing of the Conan Arthur Doyle Estate (through a gracious licensing agreement,… [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
Pictures, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:22 am
In June 2014 the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which upheld the decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that author Leslie Klinger was free to use material in the 50 Sherlock Holmes stories and novels that were no longer protected by copyright. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
Citing Scott v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 1:51 am
If all else fails, you can then talk to litigation funders--and maybe even to Morgan Chu. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 4:05 pm
An interesting false light lawsuit filed today, Walter v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:32 pm
The case is In re Sherlock V. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:58 am
All the other stories and 4 Sherlock Holmes novels are already in the public domain, since they were first published before 1923 [those interested in details of why this is the case may read the Renoir decision].Leslie Klinger co-edited an anthology of stories written by modern authors but inspired by, and in most cases depicting, "the genius detective Sherlock Holmes and his awed sidekick Dr. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 1:04 am
Doyle published his last 10 Sherlock Holmes stories in 1927 so the Estate argues that the character of Sherlock Holmes and all related copyright elements remain protected until 2023, drawn from the date upon which the final story published by Sir Conan Doyle enters the public domain. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:48 am
Indeed, an old 3d Circuit case, Donovan v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:22 am
No shit Sherlock. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 6:19 am
Inc. v. [read post]
