Search for: "Sherman v. City of Seattle" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2017, 2:42 pm by Docket Navigator
The court granted defendant City of Seattle's motion to dismiss plaintiffs' Sherman § 1 claims because Seattle was protected by state action immunity. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:37 pm by Diane Ring
District Court for the Western District of Washington, which concluded that the Seattle ordinance was an appropriate exercise of the city’s authority and did not violate the Sherman Act (because of state action immunity) and was not preempted by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:26 am by James Bickford
The Associated Press has coverage (via Seattle Post-Intelligencer), as does the Washington Times.  [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Marissa Miller
Lyle Denniston of this blog previews both cases, as does Mark Sherman of the Associated Press. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm by Keahn Morris and John Bolesta
Apparent Conflict Between Federal and State Law In seemingly direct conflict with these federal pronouncements are state cases like Dynamex v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
In the Barnett/Blackman constitutional law casebook, we included this introduction to United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
Jeffrey Fisher, who clerked for Stevens in the 1998-99 term and is now a professor at Stanford, says, “The reason he very rarely speaks first is that he really listens to his colleagues and tries to figure out what is on their minds and tries to figure out what the swing votes care about in the case.”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
Jeffrey Fisher, who clerked for Stevens in the 1998-99 term and is now a professor at Stanford, says, “The reason he very rarely speaks first is that he really listens to his colleagues and tries to figure out what is on their minds and tries to figure out what the swing votes care about in the case.”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]