Search for: "Sherman v. District of Columbia" Results 1 - 20 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2008, 8:48 am
District Court 1:08-CV-00155 (filed March 18, 2008).A group of eighteen states and the District of Columbia filed a complaint in Delaware District Court against Abbot Laboratories, Fournier Industrie et Sante and Laboratoires Fournier S.A. under the Sherman Act, alleging an unlawful monopolization of the fenofibrate market. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 1:05 am by Florian Mueller
Google and a few other Google Play class actions.Here's the complaint, which was filed in the Northern District of California on Friday (this post continues below the document):20-10-09 Bentley Et Al. v. ... by Florian MuellerThat makes it the fourth class action against Google over the Google Play app store in that district. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 1:42 pm
Two prominent federal appeals court judges say that Justice Antonin Scalia's majority opinion in the case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
GoogleDecision Date: May 27, 2020 The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia dismissed Freedom Watch’s appeal against the District Court’s decision which had dismissed its complaint alleging violation of the First Amendment, the Sherman Antitrust Act and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:02 pm
The Court will not be issuing its much anticipated Second Amendment ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:38 am by Alden Abbott
Justice Department (DOJ) against Apple for monopolization of the U.S. smartphone market (joined by 15 states and the District of Columbia) has big implications for American competition and innovation. [read post]
9 May 2007, 6:38 pm
District of Columbia holding a restrictive Washington D.C. handgun ban unconstitutional on Second Amendment grounds; Carol D. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 2:20 pm
District of Columbia, which will likely make its way to the High Court. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
The first was in probable-cause and qualified-immunity case District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:26 am by Florian Mueller
Those are the three dozen states (one of which--the District of Columbia--is a state for all practical intents and purposes here, though formally it doesn't enjoy statehood) suing Google in parallel case, minus California, which filed a separate brief (next bullet point). [read post]
”  In addition to filing a citizen petition with the FDA, Astellas unsuccessfully moved in the District Court for the District of Columbia in August 2009 for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to prevent the FDA from approving generic competing drugs. [read post]
27 May 2020, 2:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
But, as the district court explained, parallel conduct alone cannot support a claim under the Sherman Act. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
(…) Thirty States and the District of Columbia filed an amicus brief supporting the plaintiffs, and they argue that C should be able to sue A in that hypothetical. [read post]