Search for: "Sherman v. Price"
Results 1 - 20
of 799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 9:02 pm
”The text of the September 3, 2010, decision in Flying J, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 12:22 pm
The Sherman Act precludes inquiry into whether competition is good or bad, and the Supreme Court has long reasoned that the Act reflects a legislative judgment that competition is the best method of allocating resources and will result in lower prices and better goods and services. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 7:47 am
Nieman Marcus pricing dichotomy, initially described by Mike Sherman of Law for Profit. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 3:19 pm
In some circumstances, price squeezes may constitute exclusionary conduct under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
23 May 2008, 8:36 am
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 3:05 pm
The June 27, 2012, decision in Minn-Chem, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:24 am
PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. 877 (2007), which held that resale price maintenance is subject to the rule of reason under §1 of the Sherman Act, has not been favorably received. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:17 pm
Author: Jarod Bona Some antitrust questions are easy: Is naked price-fixing among competitors a Sherman Act violation? [read post]
10 Jan 2006, 9:13 am
Dagher [Duke Law case backgrounder; merit briefs], where it will decide whether a lawful joint business venture between two or more companies violates the Sherman Act where the venture sets product prices. [read post]
10 May 2007, 8:52 am
Corp. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 3:44 pm
A 2-1 panel of the Ninth Circuit today held that a "price squeeze" theory of monopolization under section 2 of the Sherman Act survived the decision in Verizon Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:32 pm
Park & Sons Co., 220 U.S. 373 (1911), that made minimum resale price agreements ("RPM agreements," also called "vertical price-fixing") per se illegal under the Sherman Act, in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 9:15 am
In their paper, “Section 2 Mangled: FTC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 7:59 pm
Valuepest.com of Charlotte, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:32 pm
For example, in US v. [read post]
6 Oct 2006, 5:00 pm
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:18 am
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:59 am
The plaintiffs in O’Brien v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:11 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2006, 11:23 am
In Texaco Inc. v. [read post]
