Search for: "Sherman v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 972
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2025, 5:03 am
As the DOJ’s complaint quotes an email from a property owner: I also rely on comparing available units to adj[usted] leases needed, to forecast leases, to gut check the pricing recs. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court decision in Parker v. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 9:49 am
Continued existence of the RPA also makes it difficult for the United States to advocate against the adoption and use of similar laws against U.S. companies operating in other jurisdictions. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 3:11 pm
Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States (E.D. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 11:09 am
But it does not prohibit the market dynamic known as an oligopoly, which is a structure prevalent in numerous industries across the United States and the world. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 11:50 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 1:10 pm
Neither is the Sherman Act. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 5:00 am
More generally, in the Verizon v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 4:19 pm
App. 1978) (“The right to a speedy trial guaranteed by the Constitutions of the United States and Texas is applicable to probation revocation hearings. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 4:16 pm
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals analyzes both speedy trial and speedy revocation motion matters under the factors set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Barker v. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
United States, the Supreme Court recognized the possibility that Section 1 of the Sherman Act can be violated when competitors all agree with a central actor to act in an anticompetitive way—what is today called a “hub-and-spoke conspiracy. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:24 am
To back up just a bit, Google, unquestionably, has a very large share of general search in the United States. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
The book argues that the binary state-versus-federal-government model that is today taken to be the essence of American federalism does not correspond to the legal or political reality of the United States in the early nineteenth century. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 2:04 pm
The recent decision by Judge Amit Mehta in United States et al. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
” Pace William Riker—who (in)famously argued that, “if in the United States one disapproves of racism, one should disapprove of federalism”—LaCroix reveals how state power was wielded in service of abolition and Black freedom. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
At the same time, it’s a concerted effort to marry constitutional history from above and below—to place Supreme Court protagonists like John Marshall, William Wirt, and Joseph Story alongside constitutional outsiders like Maria Henrietta Pinckney, John Ross, and Sherman Booth. [read post]
20 Jul 2024, 10:01 pm
He ran for the United States House of Representatives in 1876, but was defeated. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
In this circumstance, it is not surprising that leading Democratic politicians, progressive legal scholars, and centrist or center-left groups like Common Cause have portrayed a new convention called under Article V of the 1787 Constitution as an anathema that would destroy what is left of the federal system sustaining the United States. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Let me begin by stating that my views are my own as a Commissioner and not necessarily those of the U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 11:21 am
’” United States v. [read post]