Search for: "Sherman v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 1,005
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
The most high-profile grant was in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
The highest-profile grant of the day came in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am by John Elwood
That fee is set by a schedule based on the floor area of the units built. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a challenge to the constitutionality of an offense. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a defendant’s right to appeal the constitutionality of the law At Take Care, Samuel Bagenstos argues that in Husted v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 12:29 pm by Diane Ring
On Tuesday, July 31, 207, in Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al.,  v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:27 am by Joy Waltemath
However, a preliminary injunction prohibiting enforcement of the ordinance will remain in effect until the court resolves a motion to dismiss pending in a companion case (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 9:27 am by Kevin Goldberg and Karyn K. Ablin
SESAC fight as well, but for those who want to be spoon-fed, here’s a brief recap of what has happened over the last few years: In October 2012, the RMLC sued SESAC in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, alleging that SESAC was engaged in anticompetitive behavior in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court upheld the convictions of the defendants in a notorious murder trial over a claim that evidence had been suppressed in violation of Brady v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:33 pm by Robert Reznick
State antitrust laws are important nationally because about half of the States have enacted Illinois Brick repealer statutes to enable indirect purchasers to bring antitrust damages claims under state law even though they cannot bring those same claims under the Sherman Act. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:17 am
Sometimes you file appeals (or even entire lawsuits) knowing full well that they're going to lose, but hoping -- sometimes without hope -- that the United States Supreme Court will eventually step in.Almost always, you're totally right that you're going to lose, and your hopes for Supreme Court review are -- almost always -- similarly dashed.All of these are thoughts that I had when I read this morning's Ninth Circuit opinion.Of course the plaintiffs were… [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court held that a defendant had been prejudiced by his attorney’s erroneous advice that a guilty plea would not result in mandatory deportation. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 11:14 am by Howard M. Wasserman
In 2012, Sherman sued the town of Chester in state court on a host of federal and state claims, including for a regulatory taking; the town removed the case to federal district court and the case took one trip to the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:25 pm by Todd Janzen
At the time, VW cars imported into the United States lacked factory A/C units, and thus dealers installed these units for customers. [read post]
4 May 2017, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Matt Ford views Maslenjak v. [read post]