Search for: "Sherman v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 1,041
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 15-565 Issue: Whether vertical conduct by a disruptive market entrant, aimed at securing suppliers for a new retail platform, should be condemned as per se illegal under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, rather than analyzed under the rule of reason, because such vertical activity also had the alleged effect of facilitating horizontal collusion among the suppliers. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:02 am by Brian T. Pedigo, Esq.
The Costco case was an important decision for the wine industry in the Ninth Circuit United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
15 May 2014, 1:53 am by rhapsodyinbooks
United States (221 U.S. 1) that the Standard Oil Company was in violation of the Sherman Anti-trust Act of 1890 (26 Stat. 209). [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 1:58 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:00 am by Brad Walz
The United States Supreme Court recently ruled that agreements among associate members to license their trademarks to one vendor may violate the Sherman Act. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
-registered trademark may recover damages for uses of that trademark that occurred outside the United States and that were not likely to cause consumer confusion in the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
-registered trademark may recover damages for uses of that trademark that occurred outside the United States and that were not likely to cause consumer confusion in the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:04 am
On February 18, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed dismissal of a complaint filed by a ski rental store against the Deer Valley, Utah ski resort operator with its own ski rental operation alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:44 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) in favor of treating “Bigness” as an independent antitrust harm. [read post]