Search for: "Sherman v. United States"
Results 401 - 420
of 979
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2023, 3:20 pm
United States Soccer Federation, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:29 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)A federal judge must still approve the proposal, but three ebook publishers have offered to kick in a total of $69 million to settle an antitrust suit that alleges they attempted to fix ebook prices.Attorneys general of 54 states and the District of Columbia filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, State of Texas, et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 9:49 am
Zeneca and ICI agreed to: (1) pay Barr $21 million; (2) pay Barr's supplier $35.9 million; and (3) supply Barr with Zeneca-manufactured tamoxifen for resale in the United States at a high royalty rate. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 5:14 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 1:45 pm
The United States's amicus brief is available here. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:04 am
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
United States, 893 P.2d 345 (Nev. 1995); Smith v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
University of Texas at Austin and the arguments in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
United States, 337 U.S. 293 (1949) (Standard Stations). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
The Fredericksburg Care Company LP v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 1:46 pm
In Intel v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:38 pm
Before that time, Mitsubishi had sales of approximately $2 billion per year of variable speed turbines in the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:13 am
” CFIT v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:48 pm
Little Rock Cardiology Clinic v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 9:03 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 2:26 pm
Mylan, Inc., United States District Court, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 10-1077, August 31, 2011. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:52 am
The Ninth Circuit case is Holman v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 3:38 pm
First, by avoiding administrative proceedings altogether and commencing the action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the FTC avoids review by the 11th Circuit. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 7:37 am
Microsoft Corp., case number 09-cv-5535, is currently pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
