Search for: "Sherman v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 1,040
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2023, 11:57 am by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
District Court judge authorizing the use of a geofence warrant in the Jan. 6 prosecution case United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At Reason (via How Appealing), Damon Root looks at the federal government’s cert petition in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:43 am
California State Council of Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519 (1983).[6] Blue Shield v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission that SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the appointments clause. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Lee v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
 The justices also held unanimously in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
United States (whether a district court may direct that a criminal defendant’s sentence run consecutively with a yet-to-be-imposed sentence that the defendant is expected to receive for a state crime). [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
United States by an equally divided court. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:24 pm
United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by David Kimball-Stanley
§ 2333, reads: Any national of the United States injured in his or her person, property, or business by reason of an act of international terrorism, or his or her estate, survivors, or heirs, may sue therefor in any appropriate district court of the United States and shall recover threefold the damages he or she sustains and the cost of the suit, including attorney’s fees. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am by Conor McEvily
Politifact.com evaluates a claim by presidential candidate Rick Santorum that Justice Ginsburg “prefers” the South African constitution to the United States Constitution; it concludes that “Santorum’s take on Ginsburg’s comments twisted a handful of words to mean something they did not. [read post]