Search for: "Sherman v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 1,042
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2015, 3:03 pm by Michael Froomkin
California Teachers Association), to kill Obama’s immigration policy (United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:02 am by LTA-Editor
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California conducted a two-week trial in June of 2014. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Pre-1931: Sherman Act (speech about prices); Pure Food and Drug Act; state blue sky securities laws; professional licensing laws. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:46 am by Amy Howe
United States, concluding that he “still think[s] the government’s surplusage argument is pretty silly, but I’m no longer so sure the government’s reading creates an absurd amount of surplusage. [read post]
Second, the plaintiffs asserted claims on behalf of over 100 members of a proposed class of consumers throughout the United States, including class members from states other than Delaware or California. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:00 pm by Brad Dixon
To begin, the Ninth Circuit specifically concluded that the United States Supreme Court decision in NCAA v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 10:53 am by Thomas D. Nevins
Guitar Center allegedly controlled nearly one-third of all guitar and amplifier sales in the United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
“This case,” Apple’s lawyers said, “presents issues of surpassing importance to the United States economy. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
” So Justice Scalia has recognized that at least interpreting “restraint of trade” from the Sherman Act involves “a certain degree of discretion,” and therefore some lawmaking. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 11:17 am
United States, where it rebuffed a challenge to the Sherman Act. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 12:09 pm
The Rules of Decision Act: “The laws of the several states . . . shall be regarded as rules of decision in civil actions in the courts of the United States . . . . [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm by Charles G. Kels
In North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 8:20 am by Ronald Mann
Suffice it to say that those “super” adjectives have not, so far as I can tell, previously graced the United States Reports. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am by John Mikhail
”  This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
By Jared Klaus and Allen Carter State bar associations and other licensing boards were left like bleeding seals in shark-infested waters following the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision this February in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook, was “something of an anticlimax. [read post]