Search for: "Sherman v. United States"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,040
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 4:11 am
., non-criminal) “reviewable matters” under the Act include abuse of dominance (or monopolization as it is referred to in the United States under the Sherman Act), civil misleading advertising, refusal to deal, price maintenance and certain types of “vertical” restraints by dominant firms (e.g., exclusive dealing and tied selling). [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:36 am
For the jury to have found Katakis guilty of obstruction of justice, it had to find that the government proved each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:[1] that defendant Katakis knowingly altered, destroyed, or concealed electronic records or documents; [2] that defendant Katakis acted with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence an investigation that he either knew of or contemplated; and [3] that the investigation was about a matter by or within the jurisdiction of the… [read post]
15 May 2014, 1:53 am
United States (221 U.S. 1) that the Standard Oil Company was in violation of the Sherman Anti-trust Act of 1890 (26 Stat. 209). [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:54 pm
United States, 234 U.S. 600 (1914). [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:46 pm
Then, quoting Standard Oil v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 11:25 pm
United States, 435 U.S. 679, 695 (1978). 4. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm
Last year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided largely in favour of Mr. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:32 am
(Though, in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:45 am
United States” in the New Mexico Law Review. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 11:00 am
Yet baseball is the only professional sport--indeed the sole industry--in the United States that currently benefits from a judicially constructed antitrust immunity. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 12:47 pm
Shares of the resources described in paragraphs A and B, shall increase on an annual basis by three unit percent d. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
But the fact that certain activities might have taken place in the United States is irrelevant if the economic consequences are not felt in the United States economy. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:14 am
United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 7:08 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 11:51 am
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
In Gertz v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
Department of Justice has stated that the criminal division has started a far-reaching probe, and that they are “responding aggressively and taking it very seriously. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:45 am
See also United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
The Federalist states flatly that under the Clause the President must make the appointment “during the recess. [read post]
