Search for: "Sherman v. United States"
Results 541 - 560
of 982
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2012, 10:39 am
(See also the celebrated United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:39 am
(See also the celebrated United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:19 am
The United States District Court, Eastern District, Sherman Division issued an opinion in July 2012, that deals with claim value determination. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:43 am
A Sherman I claim or a series of claims, would have been aided, arguably, by the concept of “quantitative substantiality”, as recognized in the venerable 1949 Standard Stations case, and more recently in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:29 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)A federal judge must still approve the proposal, but three ebook publishers have offered to kick in a total of $69 million to settle an antitrust suit that alleges they attempted to fix ebook prices.Attorneys general of 54 states and the District of Columbia filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, State of Texas, et al. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm
(“Teva”) violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act by delaying EFFEXOR XR generic competition. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 7:07 am
Simon Property Group Inc. alleges that Simon, the largest public real estate company in the United States, and a major force in shopping malls, violated the Sherman Act’s prohibitions against monopolization and unreasonable restraints of trade. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 12:19 pm
John V. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:53 pm
" Back in the United States, politicians are walking on eggshells. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
The United States Code contains dozens of criminal conspiracy statutes. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 6:48 am
Pecover et al v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
., United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
In that challenge, McCormack v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
For example, in Nichols v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:40 am
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; Polonetsky v Better Homes Depot, 97 NY2d 46, 54; Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; Peery v United Capital Corp., 84 AD3d 1201; Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180, 1180-1181; Reid v Gateway Sherman, Inc., 60 AD3d 836, 837; Roth v Goldman, 254 AD2d 405, 406), the complaint adequately stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice by alleging that during its… [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am
Briefly: Stanley Fish has a column on United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 3:05 pm
The court overruled a 2003 en banc decision of the Seventh Circuit, (United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:01 am
Briefly: At Dorf on Law, Mike Dorf focuses on another of last Thursday’s decisions: United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Agrium Inc., et al., No. 10-1712 (7th Cir. 2012) (en banc), is a decision of all the active sitting Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
