Search for: "Sherman v. United States"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,059
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Take, for example, the Sherman Act, which makes illegal agreements in restraint of trade.4 How should a court proceed if a defendant claims that the agreement he made with his codefendant is speech protected by the First Amendment even if it’s in restraint of trade? [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 3:40 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded after rejecting both of the District Court's grounds. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 8:31 am
On implied preemption, the defendant emphasized correctly that only the United States can enforce the FDCA. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 7:29 am
Case No. 10-cv-05542 was originally filed in the United States Federal District Court for the District of Delaware. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:41 pm
Another day, another chance for the United States Supreme Court to pork litigants with an arbitration ruling. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:53 am
DFA filed suit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, alleging that ELC violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act by conspiring with DFA’s competitors to exclude it from the airport duty-free beauty products market. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:52 am
The FTAIA limits the reach of the Sherman Act outside of the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:42 am
American Express Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 7:36 am
(Evergreen) appealed from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissing its Second Amended Complaint (complaint). [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:35 am
United States, Maracich v. [read post]
19 May 2013, 7:20 am
In US v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:53 am
Sherman, No. 11-35729 (9th Cir. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 1:58 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:25 am
United States, the Court is considering whether the “recommendation” of a government attorney is intangible property that can be the subject of an extortion attempt under the Hobbs Act. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 8:25 pm
On Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court handed down its opinion in another of this term’s major class action cases. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:35 pm
So now we have Brazil v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
See, e.g., Peterson v. [read post]
