Search for: "Sherman v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 1,040
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Joshua Matz
United States, a case about the harmless error standard. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:05 am
  Plaintiffs, twelve Wisconsin franchisees brought an action under the Sherman Act, RICO, the Wisconsin Anti-Trust Act, and other Wisconsin consumer protection laws in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, alleging, inter alia, that Quizno's "fraudulently induced plaintiffs and the Class to purchase franchises and thereafter exploited their control and economic power in order to extract exorbitant and unjustifiable… [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm
Noerr Motor Freight Inc., 365 U.S. 127, 137-38 (1961) and United Mine Workers v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am by Cormac Early
 In his Verdict column for Justia, Vikram David Amar analyzes the issue of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG)’s standing in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:22 pm
However, the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:53 pm by Florian Mueller
About a month ago, Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California further narrowed the class-action lawsuit against Qualcomm that sought to piggyback on FTC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:02 am by Dylan Ballard
  But the fact that certain activities might have taken place in the United States is irrelevant if the economic consequences are not felt in the United States economy. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 8:43 am
” Solicitor General’s PerspectiveMalcolm Stewart argued on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae, supporting neither party’s theory. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will consider the limits of tax-law obstruction-of-justice charges. [read post]