Search for: "Sherman v. United States" Results 821 - 840 of 980
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2013, 1:54 am by Florian Mueller
In late July the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a "final" (but not final-final) Office action rejecting all claims of the '915 patent. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:25 pm by Mona Solouki
(import "generally denotes a product (or perhaps a service) [that] has been brought into the United States from abroad") (quoting Turicentro S.A. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm by Marie Louise
(Patently-O) US Copyright – Decisions Breaking news: Lara Jade Coton awarded $130,000 in damages (Plagiarism Today) Ohio record pirating statute pre-empted by Copyright Act: State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by Tyler Hoguet
They point out, however, that the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit approved MLB’s elimination of these minor league teams under MLB’s antitrust exemption. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:06 am by Marie Louise
New Zealand hit with first online infringement warnings (Ars Technica)   Spain Apple loses iPad design lawsuit against small Spanish tablet computer maker NT-K (FOSS Patents) (FOSS Patents) Piracy may boost sales, judge concludes (TorrentFreak)   Sweden Guilty verdict in record-breaking Swedish file-sharing case (TorrentFreak)   United Kingdom Premium rate service regulator to help combat pirated music sales (Out-Law) Lady GaGa v Lady Goo Goo – Court orders… [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:51 am by Howard M. Wasserman
” Assistant to the Solicitor General Sarah Harrington argued for the United States as amicus curiae in support of Chester. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by law shucks
Desmarais is also registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 7:22 am
Neither party attempted to quantify the risk created by the defendant's conduct; and vague words such as "substantial" are not a satisfactory substitute for data, as we remarked in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:06 am by ronaldrichenburg
  Its focus is on preserving the Union (i.e. the United States, seen as a union of states), with slavery treated as a subordinate consideration. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:06 am by ronaldrichenburg
  Its focus is on preserving the Union (i.e. the United States, seen as a union of states), with slavery treated as a subordinate consideration. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm by Laura Welborn
DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas stated that DHS’s actions illustrate its “ongoing commitment to Afghan nationals who provided valuable assistance to the United States over the past two decades. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am by Cormac Early
Briefly: Stanley Fish has a column on United States v. [read post]