Search for: "Sherman v. United States"
Results 841 - 860
of 980
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2009, 3:46 pm
rejected Plaintiffs' argument that an antitrust stalwart, United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:28 pm
United States, No. 08-67, at this link. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:42 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
FTC and California AG Join in Challenging Reverse Payment Settlements in the Pharmaceutical Industry
6 Mar 2009, 7:03 am
"[i]Watson was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California and alleges violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, and California's Cartwright and Unfair Competition Acts. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 7:17 pm
United States, No. 08-108, at this link. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:58 am
Law Offices of Curtis V. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:15 pm
And Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg issued the opinion of the Court in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:04 am
On February 18, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed dismissal of a complaint filed by a ski rental store against the Deer Valley, Utah ski resort operator with its own ski rental operation alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:15 pm
Fairchild (Eds.), Investigating Christian Privilege and Religious Oppression in the United States, (Sense Publishers, Dec. 2008), reviewed in the Ames Tribune. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 11:45 am
("Abbott") on claims brought under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:05 am
In another case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld application of the Noerr-Pennington doctrine in Kaiser Health Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat) United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:38 am
("Abbott") on claims brought under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:03 pm
The United States has seen several foodborne illness outbreaks in recent years, including a 2008 salmonella outbreak linked to raw tomatoes and peppers that sickened 1,442 people in 43 states,2 a 2006 E. coli outbreak that was later linked to Dole brand baby spinach and resulted in 204 confirmed E. coli cases,3 and a 2002 E. coli outbreak linked to ConAgra brand ground beef, in which nearly 19 million pounds of beef were recalled.4 Perhaps the most well-known foodborne… [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:33 pm
The United States has seen several foodborne illness outbreaks in recent years, including a 2008 salmonella outbreak linked to raw tomatoes and peppers that sickened 1,442 people in 43 states,2 a 2006 E. coli outbreak that was later linked to Dole brand baby spinach and resulted in 204 confirmed E. coli cases,3 and a 2002 E. coli outbreak linked to ConAgra brand ground beef, in which nearly 19 million pounds of beef were recalled.4 Perhaps the most well-known foodborne… [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:48 pm
Little Rock Cardiology Clinic v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm
Noerr Motor Freight Inc., 365 U.S. 127, 137-38 (1961) and United Mine Workers v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 4:00 pm
– opinion article by Lawrence Lessig (Lessig) RIAA graduated response plan: Q&A with Cary Sherman (Ars Technica) RIAA plan meets with resistance from some ISPs (Internet Cases) (Techdirt) Licensing deal breaks down, Warner Music Group demands YouTube remove its music (ContentAgenda) (Techdirt) (Out-Law) (Techdirt) GateHouse Media sues New York Times over linking to its online publications (Techdirt) (The Trademark Blog) iPodhash project moves to Wikileaks following DMCA… [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 7:22 pm
"High court to hear enemy combatant case": Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has a report that begins, "The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide whether the president may order that people picked up in the United States be detained indefinitely and without criminal charges. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 4:02 pm
" Such a result is particularly undesirable, AAI further explains, because the United States is likely to argue that "a price squeeze should be eliminated as an independent antitrust offense" - an issue that AAI "has vigorously contested . . . in its brief" but which respondents did not address. [read post]
