Search for: "Sherman v. United States"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,002
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2008, 3:02 pm
(quoting United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:07 am
We're the government, and we're here to copy - Blueport Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 3:06 pm
"Lawyers for the State of Louisiana asked the United States Supreme Court on Monday to reconsider its decision last month striking down laws that made child rape a capital offense. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 4:12 pm
Campfield v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ that its… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:22 pm
However, the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
United States - addressing whether a federal court of appeals may increase a criminal defendant's sentence in the absence of a cross-appeal by the government. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
United States (07-330) is available here. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:39 pm
Bridge v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
DVSS brought a motion in the district court to dismiss Bamberg's claims on the grounds that, because Bamberg did not obtain its products directly from J & J, it lacked standing to pursue antitrust claims based on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
DVSS brought a motion in the district court to dismiss Bamberg's claims on the grounds that, because Bamberg did not obtain its products directly from J & J, it lacked standing to pursue antitrust claims based on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
Brief amicus curiae of United States (recommending holding of petition pending decision in MetLife v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 5:20 am
Finally, the district court refused to follow Valley Drug Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 11:26 pm
A plea agreement was filed in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 9:07 am
John's United Church of Christ, et al. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 8:03 am
United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951), and The Steel Seizure Case, 343 U.S. 579 (1952).Minton had the good sense to leave after seven years on the Court. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 6:31 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 11:31 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 6:55 pm
The states alleged violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act and the New York, Illinois and Michigan antitrust statutes. [read post]
