Search for: "Sherman v. United States"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,001
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2007, 1:00 am
In Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:00 am
In Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 9:29 am
The United States Supreme Court issued five opinions today. [read post]
7 May 2007, 8:49 am
And today the law has changed: A plaintiff can’t prove a violation of the Sherman Act simply by showing that a plaintiff has monopoly power; it has to prove anticompetitive conduct. [read post]
4 May 2007, 4:25 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 8:17 pm
See 316 U.S. at 252 ("[t]he price fixing features of appellees' licensing system, which are not within the protection of the patent law, violate the Sherman Act").United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 8:07 am
United States, supra; Hoke v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 6:02 pm
However, the Commission concluded that, while JEDEC minutes indicated a “reluctance” to adopt patented technologies, those minutes did not “state that the committee will not standardize a patented technology, and the basic JEDEC and EIA documents repeatedly spell out procedures under which patented technologies may be accepted. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 9:49 am
Zeneca and ICI agreed to: (1) pay Barr $21 million; (2) pay Barr's supplier $35.9 million; and (3) supply Barr with Zeneca-manufactured tamoxifen for resale in the United States at a high royalty rate. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:40 am
The third case in the trilogy of securities antitrust immunity, United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
The United States was founded on a contradiction: all men are created equal; our Constitution enshrines slavery. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 11:09 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 10:31 am
Although HDC argued that both United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 4:31 pm
Apotex et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
She would have held that the Oregon Supreme Court had faithfully applied Gore and State Farm v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 2:59 pm
Strunk v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 1:20 am
Jan. 4, 2007):Plaintiffs-appellants, members of a class of present and former professional models, and their counsel appeal from two orders entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Baer, J.) approving settlements and awarding attorneys' fees in a class action brought against defendant modeling agencies for conspiracy to fix commissions charged to members of plaintiff class, in violation of the Sherman Act. . . . [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 7:22 am
Neither party attempted to quantify the risk created by the defendant's conduct; and vague words such as "substantial" are not a satisfactory substitute for data, as we remarked in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 7:39 am
United States v. [read post]
