Search for: "Shipley v. California" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2023, 12:27 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Thirty-one years ago, the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Shipley v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:31 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The Implications of Zurich” ( https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/insights/legal/workers-compensation/b/recent-cases-news-trends-developments/posts/california-is-shipley-on-life-support-the-implications-of-zurich ), examines a panel decision ( Mayor v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:44 am
On August 5, the U.S. attorney's office for Northern California filed a brief informing the court that the federal government may seek to intervene in the matter, as it previously did in the Stauffer v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:27 pm
The latest issue of Los Angeles Lawyer has an article by Michael Shipley titled "Maroney's Minefield: California's complicated rules for obtaining a new trial can lead all but the most careful to an unfair result" starting on page 29, about Maroney v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:24 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (WCAB—ADJ8655364, ADJ14830172) Petitions for Reconsideration—WCAB’s Time to Act on Petition— Shipley —WCAB relied on rationale in Shipley v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:57 am by John Day
The court’s reasoning was guided by the recent Tennessee Supreme Court case of Shipley v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am by Amy Howe
Caulkett and Bank of America v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:17 am by Amy Howe
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission could have on California’s independent redistricting regime. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 8:07 pm
Attorney Daniel Alter in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Doe v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:59 am by Marie Louise
Shipley (Gray on Claims) The Rambus Opinions: CAFC rules on the ‘reasonable forseeability’ of litigation: Micron Technology, Inc. v. [read post]