Search for: "Shivers v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2015, 5:27 am
On the video, [Shivers] pointed to the table and stated, `He just threatened me. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:49 am
On June 28, 2024, the United States Supreme Court sent a long, cold shiver through the ranks of Federal agencies in its landmark decision in the case of Loper Bright v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 7:09 pm
On Tuesday, August 19, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Cooper v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:41 am
Last year, the Superior Court sent a shiver through the bar with its opinion in Barrick v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:19 am
Ofman v Tenenbaum Berger & Shivers, LLP2023 NY Slip Op 03471 Decided on June 28, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department is a case which reversed dismissal of a legal malpractice claim. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 6:00 am
In Ofman v Tenenbaum Berger & Shivers LLP 2020 NY Slip Op 32828(U) July 23, 2020 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 524482/2019 Judge: Richard Velasquez, Plaintiff alleged that had the attorney been quicker, the defendant would not have been able to leave the US and the judgment would have been collectible. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
This morning the Court announced its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 6:38 am
See Shivers v. [read post]
29 Nov 2024, 6:59 am
Accepting the allegations in the complaint as true and according the plaintiffs the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the complaint states a cause of action for legal malpractice (see Ofman v Tenenbaum Berger & Shivers, LLP, 217 AD3d 960, 962). [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 8:12 am
The case, Adams v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:39 am
The Court noted that, post Herring v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:23 am
And in Yu v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 4:41 am
Shivers v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 8:55 am
However, affording the legal malpractice cause of action a liberal construction and according the plaintiff every favorable inference, the complaint does state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see generally Hamoudeh v Mandel, 62 AD3d 948, 949; Maiolini v McAdams & Fallon, P.C., 61 AD3d 644, 645; Malik v Beal, 54 AD3d 910, 911). [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:45 pm
For example, in Sprint Comm'ns v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 10:11 pm
Tags: Affirmative Action, Northwest Austin v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:12 am
The action is filed as “United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:02 pm
In Lexion Medical, LLC v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 8:25 am
When the Supreme Court granted cert in United State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
The questions raised in three petitions left shivering in the (ironic) cold, Virginia v. [read post]
