Search for: "Shoe v. Administrator, Va*" Results 1 - 20 of 173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2015, 10:43 pm
The same thought apply mutatis mutandis to paragraphs 49 to 51 and 77 of the judgment of 6 November 2014 in Vans v OHIM (Representation of a wavy line), T‑53/13, also invoked by K-Swiss. [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:32 am by Mark Lewis
The shoes, or dominoes, are: UBC which in announcing it will not sign the model deal, described the move as ""taking the bolder, more principled and sustainable option." [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 8:30 am by FM Librarian
Border," New York Times, 20 April 2018 [text]Immigration Court Cases Now Involve More Long-time Residents (TRAC Immigration, April 2018) [text]- See also related HRW comment.NIPNLG v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Appeals Administrative/Aboriginal Law: Discrimination; Standard of ReviewCanada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:29 am by FDABlog HPM
According to ViroPharma, FDA violated the Administrative Procedure act (“APA”) “by adopting and applying in vitro dissolution testing as the bioequivalence testing method for vancomycin, in direct conflict with the FDA’s own regulations, and by basing its approval of the three generic vancomycin ANDAs on this improper in vitro testing.”  [read post]