Search for: "Shoemake v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2022, 5:19 pm by Patricia Salkin
Their evidence against these defendants consisted primarily of emails sent to county officials, but as the court concluded, “this correspondence at most alleges that [fellow tiger owners] Kukol and Shoemaker provided advice and proposals to Nye County, but this does not allege that they were state actors. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm by Series of Essays
Miller, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law McGirt v. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 12:30 am by Karen Tani
Over at Jotwell, Reuel Schiller reviews Sarah Milov's The Cigarette: A Political History (The Cigarette and the State).The Federal Judicial Center has been "live-tweeting" Schenck v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 6:15 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Shoemaker Not Yet America’s Best Idea: Law, Inequality, and Grand Canyon National Park 91 University of Colorado Law Review 559 (2020), U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 20-3 Sarah Krakoff Seminole Tribe v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am by Patti Waller
E. coliO157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[4]  The E. coli bacterium is among the most… [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 2:54 am by Walter Olson
California state agency in charge of Prop 65 enforcement seeks to effectively reverse judge’s recent ruling and exempt naturally occurring acrylamide levels in coffee from need for warning [Cal Biz Lit] Prop 65 listing mechanism requires listing of substances designated by a strictly private organization, spot the problem with that [WLF brief in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:30 am by Shelby D. Green
Green Many first-year property classes start with the centuries-old Johnson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:43 am by Joy Waltemath
But her ADA claim could not move forward, because knowledge she took FMLA leave and might need more FMLA leave in the future, without more, was insufficient to show she was “regarded as” disabled (Shoemaker v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
Malice for the purpose of showing an abuse of the qualified privilege only requires showing of a state of mind arising from hatred or ill will evidencing a willingness “to vex, harass, annoy or injure. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Case Number: 15-cv-01573 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Date Filed: September 28, 2015 Date of Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 24, 2015 12/23/2015 3/22/2016 2015-138 SEC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:21 am by Kelly Buchanan
This issue haunted the courts until 1983, when the case of R v Williams came before the Court of Appeal. [read post]