Search for: "Shoemaker v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
Georgetown Law observes the centennial of United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
A summary of the facts The case of Macatė v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:42 pm
The post The Strange Case of United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 8:56 pm
Super. 161 (Sept. 21, 2022) Bender, Dubrow & King w/o dissent/concurrence Nota bene: A judicial friend sent me a copy of Shoemaker v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:45 am
v=0MDBIGACxig&t=60s. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 5:19 pm
Their evidence against these defendants consisted primarily of emails sent to county officials, but as the court concluded, “this correspondence at most alleges that [fellow tiger owners] Kukol and Shoemaker provided advice and proposals to Nye County, but this does not allege that they were state actors. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm
Miller, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law McGirt v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 5:30 am
Shoemaker, 965 F. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 12:30 am
Over at Jotwell, Reuel Schiller reviews Sarah Milov's The Cigarette: A Political History (The Cigarette and the State).The Federal Judicial Center has been "live-tweeting" Schenck v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 6:15 am
Shoemaker Not Yet America’s Best Idea: Law, Inequality, and Grand Canyon National Park 91 University of Colorado Law Review 559 (2020), U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 20-3 Sarah Krakoff Seminole Tribe v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am
E. coliO157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[4] The E. coli bacterium is among the most… [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 12:44 pm
”); Young v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:59 pm
Janus v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 2:54 am
California state agency in charge of Prop 65 enforcement seeks to effectively reverse judge’s recent ruling and exempt naturally occurring acrylamide levels in coffee from need for warning [Cal Biz Lit] Prop 65 listing mechanism requires listing of substances designated by a strictly private organization, spot the problem with that [WLF brief in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:30 am
Green Many first-year property classes start with the centuries-old Johnson v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
” That title succinctly states the insult. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 6:30 am
Through a reading of Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:43 am
But her ADA claim could not move forward, because knowledge she took FMLA leave and might need more FMLA leave in the future, without more, was insufficient to show she was “regarded as” disabled (Shoemaker v. [read post]
