Search for: "Short v. City of Birmingham"
Results 1 - 20
of 105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2009, 2:09 am
Regina (Aweys and Others) v Birmingham City Council; Moran v Manchester City Council House of Lords “A local housing authority had been entitled to decide that overcrowded families were homeless but to leave them there in the short term; it was a question of fact what term was too long. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 2:09 am
Birmingham City Council v Ali and others; Moran v Manchester City Council (Women's Aid Federation of England and another intervening) [2009] UKHL 36; [2009] WLR (D) 221 “Although it had not been reasonable for families to remain in their current accommodation indefinitely, the local housing authority had been entitled to leave them there in the short [...] [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 11:31 am
Birmingham City Council v Abdishakur Aweys & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 48. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:30 am
Hot on the heels of the decision in R (Imam) v London Borough of Croydon (2021) EWHC 739 (Admin) (see our note here) comes this altogether more satisfying decision, Elkundi & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Birmingham City Council (2021) EWHC 1024 (Admin), on the nature and enforceability of the duty under s. 193(2) Housing Act 1996. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 2:42 am
On a split of three to two, they have decided, in short, that the providers of contracted-out services will not be subject to the Human Rights Act as public authorities. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 12:32 pm
As CLP put it: It appears that Birmingham City Council implemented a system of using High Court bailiffs without getting proper legal advice. [read post]
26 May 2012, 4:53 am
Birmingham City Council v Richard Lloyd (2012) CA Civ 23 May 2012 (On Lawtel but not on BAILLI) A short note on this hearing as it is a situation which is likely to become far more common. [read post]
26 May 2012, 4:53 am
Birmingham City Council v Richard Lloyd (2012) CA Civ 23 May 2012 (On Lawtel but not on BAILLI) A short note on this hearing as it is a situation which is likely to become far more common. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 10:25 am
Just a short note about an ASBO case that was decided in the Divisional Court today - Birmingham City Council v Dixon (18.3.09). [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 4:14 pm
Birmingham City Council v Forde [2009] EWHC 12 (QB) was the High Court hearing of Birmingham’s appeal from the High Court (Costs) case we reported on in August last year. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Tomlinson & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2010] UKSC 8 This is the Supreme Court judgment on the appeal from the Court of Appeal of what was then called Ali & Ibrahim v Birmingham City Council [2008] EWCA 1228 [our report here]. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Tomlinson & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2010] UKSC 8 This is the Supreme Court judgment on the appeal from the Court of Appeal of what was then called Ali & Ibrahim v Birmingham City Council [2008] EWCA 1228 [our report here]. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
Khazai & Ors, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2010] EWHC 2576 (Admin) We've been waiting for this one. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
Khazai & Ors, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2010] EWHC 2576 (Admin) We've been waiting for this one. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:16 pm
May, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWHC 1399 (Admin)When can a Local Authority refuse to accept an application as homeless? [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
All three appellants were appealing review decisions by Birmingham City Council. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
All three appellants were appealing review decisions by Birmingham City Council. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:09 pm
Anyway, on to Ali & Ibrahim v Birmingham City Council [2008] EWCA 1228. [read post]
5 May 2009, 3:56 pm
FRE wold supply properties to Birmingham at very short notice and ended up being used, a lot, by the HPU. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 1:21 pm
Samuels v Birmingham City Council (2019) UKSC 28 The Supreme Court, finally, has delivered its judgment on the issue of the assessment of ‘reasonable expenses’ when considering the affordability of rent in homelessness decisions. [read post]
