Search for: "Short v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 19,783
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2025, 11:44 am
A short excerpt from the 33,000-word De Blasio v. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 11:05 am
In Virginia v. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 6:55 am
Robins and Rumsfeld v. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] Tornetta v. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
As I leave the FDIC, I thought there might be value in sharing some of the lessons of that experience as we head into a period of uncertainty about the future path of financial regulation in the United States and globally. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 12:51 pm
The Panel edited transcript will be posted online to the Journal of Legal Education's website in short order. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 11:23 am
Trump’s Ellipse Speech incited the violence at the Capitol on January 6 and could satisfy the Supreme Court’s standard for ‘incitement’ under Brandenburg v. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 9:33 am
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 9:30 pm
These included two that reached the Supreme Court: Powell v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm
For example, in Texas v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 6:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 10:18 am
Pereira v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 7:03 am
United States, on the First Step Act’s sentencing reduction provisions, and Stanley v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 4:00 am
As established by the court in Trump v. [read post]
12 Jan 2025, 10:45 am
On the other hand, if even Minnesota’s expert finds Generative AI useful to preparing important material in support of the state’s policies, perhaps the court ought to question the state’s anti-AI motives with extra scrutiny. [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 5:10 pm
It requires divestment within a fairly short period of time and gives the President the authority to extend those time limits once by 90 days. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 6:48 pm
In People v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 1:23 pm
During his address, Merchan described People v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 7:10 am
This religious freedom case asks whether the State of New York can prevent anti-abortion organizations from discriminating against employees based on their reproductive health decision-making, i.e., employees who have used contraception or have had an abortion.The case is CompassCare v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 6:38 am
The justices will return to the bench this morning for oral arguments in TikTok, Inc. v. [read post]
