Search for: "Short v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 22,600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2014, 1:43 am
I have a short piece in today's Irish Independent on the remarkable legal battle between Microsoft and US prosecutors over access to data on non-US users which is stored outside the US, which has now resulted in a finding that Microsoft is in contempt of court.The Irish Independent doesn't currently include inline links to resources in stories, so for background here are:The Magistrate Judge's original ruling that Microsoft must hand over the data;The opinion of Michael… [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 6:05 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:44 am
Kucik appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered on a jury's verdict, for two counts of possessing a short-barreled shotgun, contrary to Wis. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 7:25 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 12:22 pm
In State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:20 pm
Number 5 on her list is, "Do use short sentences. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 10:12 am
STRs are central to vigorous debates at local and state levels. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 10:12 am
STRs are central to vigorous debates at local and state levels. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:09 am
Here's the intro by Judge William Pryor:This appeal and cross-appeal require us to review the convictions and sentence of Damion Baston, an international sex trafficker nicknamed “Drac” (short for Dracula) who sometimes dressed up as a vampire, complete with yellow contact lenses and gold-plated fangs. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
In a short five-paragraph order, the state supreme court dismissed Abbeville v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
Today the government filed a short response to the detainees’ petition for an en banc rehearing in Hatim v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:33 am
#MAGA plaintiffs are routinely overclaiming state action by Internet services as a short-sighted ploy to force the services to carry garbage content that harms the services’ audiences. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 11:32 am
In short, the Roe v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:54 am
United States (1928) and Goldman v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
The three are: (1) alleging proximate cause, (2) Subsequent attorney principles, and (3) account stated. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 1:23 pm
” Nash, slip op. at 13 (citing United States v. [read post]
