Search for: "Short v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 19,912
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2025, 6:07 am
Morrison v. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 3:11 am
In a decision last year, United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 6:34 pm
Because of its short timeline, the CRA has teeth only when three criteria are satisfied: (1) there’s a change in presidential administration, (2) the new President’s agenda has the support of both houses of Congress, and (3) the prior administration either (a) failed to promulgate important regulations early enough to avoid the 60-day dragnet or (b) failed to submit the regulation to Congress. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 9:18 am
The unsigned order in Department of State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 6:30 am
Jefferson Powell To turn now to the reviews, Jeff Powell’s post offers several supportive observations: he suggests that the general need for balance in the law reinforces my proposal’s legitimacy, he points to the majority opinion on gun rights in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
The Association did not "established that the City's process for resolving requests for accommodations to the vaccine mandate fell short of the requirements" of either the City Human Rights Law or the State [Human Rights Law];2. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
The Association did not "established that the City's process for resolving requests for accommodations to the vaccine mandate fell short of the requirements" of either the City Human Rights Law or the State [Human Rights Law];2. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 12:00 am
Vázquez (Georgetown University Law Center) Christopher A. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
We cover recent developments in Delaware, including the latest opinion in Tornetta v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
Sandford and Lochner v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 3:21 pm
(See, e.g., Farmland Protection Alliance v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 12:25 pm
Second, famous jury verdicts as well as Learned Hand’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 11:17 am
Susan V. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 10:50 am
Excavating v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 8:16 am
A third complaint, by a Democratic member of the New York State Senate, was submitted to the state disciplinary committee that day as well. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 7:51 am
Mozilla stated that the previous DOJ’s proposals would force it to “fundamentally reexamine [its] entire operating model,” constituting an existential threat. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 7:39 am
Mitola v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 7:39 am
Mitola v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 7:12 am
S., at ___ (slip op., at 1) (citing United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 5:01 am
"); Tannous v. [read post]
