Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 8,615
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2025, 4:31 am by Kalvis Golde
United States 24-482Issue: Whether criminal restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act is penal for purposes of the Constitution’s ex post facto clause. [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm by eorozco
Top Cop Shop, Inc., supra (“The December 5, 2024 amended order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, case No. 4:24–cv–478, is stayed”). [6] Smith v. [read post]
1 Feb 2025, 6:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Delmont, Distinguished Professor of History at Dartmouth and author of Half American: The Heroic Story of African Americans Fighting World War II at Home and Abroad“How did the United States turn away from the promise of racial integration and quality education? [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 12:43 pm by John Ross
 Second Circuit: There was no "United States" in 1676 so there cannot be any preemption. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 6:57 am by Adam Cox
Indeed, Roberts relied heavily on Justice Robert Jackson’s concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The proposed Idaho Memorial (which would need to be approved on the floor of both houses of the state legislature before it would take effect) provides in part: We, your Memorialists, the House of Representatives and the Senate of the State of Idaho assembled in the First Regular Session of the Sixty-eighth Idaho Legislature, do hereby respectfully represent that: WHEREAS, the decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 4:54 am by Charles Sartain
Says the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, No. [read post]