Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 8,699
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2025, 6:23 am by John Elwood
United States, 23-1281Issues: (1) Whether Feres v. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 1:09 pm by Robin Frazer Clark
while he was serving his Country in the United States Army and who was imprisoned for two years in Ft. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 5:55 am by Harold Hongju Koh
We should not forget that the rule of law problem the United States faces is bigger than Trump. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 11:49 am by Patricia Hughes
INTRODUCTION In the midst of writing this post yesterday, January 6th, I thought back to that day in 2021 when Donald Trump attempted a coup in the United States to seize the presidency despite having lost the 2020 election. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 9:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s June 2024 decision in the SEC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2025, 5:53 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Corozal Auto Repair Inc., a case heard in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, provides valuable insights into the intricate legal landscape of workers' compensation law. [read post]
5 Jan 2025, 8:27 am by John Floyd
United States in which a defendant was convicted of possessing and selling one-half gallon of whiskey in violation of the National Prohibition Act. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 8:25 am by Joshua Smeltzer
United States) and the power of a bankruptcy trustee to avoid a debtor’s tax payment to the United States (United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 10:23 pm by Josh Blackman
Second, Roberts offers this account of the Bank of the United States debate and McCulloch v. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 2:30 am by Mark I. Schickman, Schickman Law
In July 2016, Wawrzenski was “scolded” for wearing a dress that was too short and “rides up” when she walks. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 2:30 am by Mark I. Schickman, Schickman Law
In July 2016, Wawrzenski was “scolded” for wearing a dress that was too short and “rides up” when she walks. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
In Cadwalladr, the Court of Appeal also confirmed that “publication” for the purposes of section 1(1) (and indeed, the 2013 Act as a whole unless otherwise stated) continued to have its common law meaning – a communication of the statement to someone other than the claimant – and that each single communication is a separate and actionable tort. [read post]
28 Dec 2024, 10:03 pm by Josh Blackman
United States, 411 U.S. 526, 541, 93 S.Ct. 1702, 1711, 36 L.Ed.2d 472 (1973); Fortson v. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 6:36 pm by Joe Rosenbaum
In short, the 5th Circuit Court held that since the government met its burden under Nken v. [read post]