Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 8,751
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2025, 5:47 am
And indeed the noted Murthy v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 9:22 pm
Judge Ho described it in his United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 1:24 pm
In June 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided the matter of Calcano v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 4:33 pm
Plumrose alleged that its marks are well known and have a reputation for superior quality in Venezuela and among Venezuelans living in the United States, and that USA Ham is seeking to benefit from that reputation, causing damage to Plumrose. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 12:42 pm
Trump also issued an executive order titled “Clarifying the Military’s Role in Protecting the Territorial Integrity of the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 12:27 pm
United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88 (1935); Banks v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 11:25 am
United States, 577 F.2d 1206, 1244 (5th Cir. 1978)). [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 11:33 pm
The term "Intelligence Community" has the meaning given the term in section 3003 of title 50, United States Code. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 10:24 am
(One of the advantages of that focus is that my article is mercifully short—only 10,500 words!) [read post]
19 Jan 2025, 4:47 am
However, Article V speaks of ratifications by state legislatures. [read post]
18 Jan 2025, 8:24 am
However, Article V speaks of ratifications by state legislatures. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter ofDecisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 12:11 pm
TikTok Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 10:17 am
But, as of the extended deadline, only 35 states had ratified, three short of the required supermajority. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 8:19 am
TikTok Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 8:17 am
United States, 250 U. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 7:43 am
United States, 250 U. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 11:11 am
United States, Shah v. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 9:05 am
., et al. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 2:32 pm
EO N-4-25 will likely be at odds with recent case law that sets the requirements for analyzing a project’s impacts on evacuation routes and wildfire risk, including People of the State of California ex rel Rob Bonta Attorney General v. [read post]
