Search for: "Shutt v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2013, 2:20 am by Andrew Trask
Shutts, the Supreme Court stated that in a class action “wholly or predominantly for money judgments[,]” a court must afford class members notice and an opportunity to opt out. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 6:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Hart v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:01 am by Peter Vodola
One opinion addressing personal jurisdiction over key defendants, in a diversity case, is Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 4:57 am by Robin Effron
  The CAFA home state exception might be forcing some of the smaller, more local class actions that the plaintiff bar initially resisted in the Phillips Petroleum v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:36 am by Anthony P. Guettler
., Shutts & Bowen, LLP, Miami, Florida This article was originally published in the Summer, 2023 issue of ActionLine, a Florida Bar Real Property and Trust Law Section publication. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:36 am by Anthony P. Guettler
., Shutts & Bowen, LLP, Miami, Florida Immigration into Florida from other states and countries continues apace, and Florida property continues to be an attractive investment opportunity for outsiders. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 1:36 pm
And from the text:According to the conventional understanding of Phillips Petroleum v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Shutts, require an individualized choice of law analysis for each class member’s claim before a single State’s law may be applied to a nationwide class action? [read post]